I believe Vince Cable should certainly have been sacked over the revelations made by a whistle blower. After showing such bad judgement how long can he survive? What does this say about Cameron's own judgement? Why has he been left in position after espousing views about a potential BskyB bidder which were prejudicial to say the least?
Notwithstanding the quality of some of the Murdoch empires output. The buyer has a choice and without Murdoch rattling so many cages the worlds media business would arguably be less varied and challenging. If you don't like Murdoch don't buy his output. To use a political position in a such prejudiced way makes a meal for lawyers and damages our image with the rest of the world. Investment from the rest of the world is always important to bringing jobs to the UK. Surely we should always endeavour to play with a straight deck. Sacking Cable would send a clear message that we expect people and organisations to be treated fairly no matter whether their names are, Mud or Murdoch.
No comments:
Post a Comment